Sunday, 6 October 2013

Review of an Open Course: Developing Apps for iOS (Fall 2010)


This week in my course I have studied the process of designing an effective distance-learning course.  Many designers follow the ADDIE design process and with each stage critical, no stage of the design should have more weight than the other.

We have been asked to explore an Open Course this week and I have chosen to look at a course offered by Stanford through iTunes.  This course is completely free of charge and is available through the iTunes U app.  With this app there are many courses on a variety of topics, free of charge.  I began looking at one called ‘Developing Apps for iOS (Fall 2010).  This was previously a course offered by Stanford University to its students and is now offered by the university to the public for knowledge acquisition- not for any credit. 

By no means am I a technology genius as I’ve always assumed you would need to be to do such a thing as App design, and so I thought it might be interesting to see the course content and its layout.  After choosing the course from iTunes U, you are taken to one page that holds all of the information for the course.  There is a description of the course followed by a course outline and then a list of podcasts, which hold the lessons.  We are given many details about the course in the first podcast.  There is an explanation of the schedule for the course, the course content is briefly discussed, technology requirements are shared, and the prerequisites for the course are given, all within the first 10 minutes.  As there is no classroom as such to explore with different sections for this information, it was useful to have this concise introduction.  It was especially useful for me as the prerequisites required a background in programming, which I do not possess, signaling to me that this was not an appropriate course for myself.  

As a distance-learning course, many of the required resources were there. There was a video of the presenter with a PowerPoint slide alongside him.  Simonson et al (2012) list 12 “golden rules” for use of technology in education.  #5 tells us to ‘make all four media available to teachers and learners.  Print, audio, television, and computers should all be available’ (p. 172).   Students are also very involved in the learning as after every two presentations, you are expected to complete a practical activity and replicate what you have been taught and shown.

Simonson et al (2012) describe the expectations of a distance learner as having relevant content, clear directions throughout the course, control of the pace of learning, and materials that are useful and interactive.  This course meets these needs. However, as this is a free distance-learning course, there is not the support available that is needed.  One of the main components of distance learning is ‘connecting learners, resources and instructors (Simonson et al, 2012, p. 34) and this is not possible without the support from the university.  During the first podcast you are given a link to the Stanford course website and can receive transcripts of the slides and homework assignments.  However, the FAQ area on this site tells you that help is only available to enrolled Stanford students. Simonson et al (2012) list two more needs of the learner as requiring ‘a means of drawing attention to individual concerns’ and ‘a way of testing their progress and getting feedback from their instructors’ (p. 176).  With no contact with the university, there is no way to meet these critical needs.  This course also lacks support of peers. 

Overall this course, when enrolled as a student and using the iTunes U app to obtain your lessons and assignments, is an effective course and students can receive support as needed.  If taking this as a free course you will need a lot of self-discipline, as there are no deadlines for assignments.  It is very likely that if you are a learner doing such a course without receiving certification or credit, you already have that motivation that is needed.

I realized quickly that this is not my learning style.  I did not have the attention span to listen to my lectures in a hall while pursuing my bachelors degree and I believe I would struggle with these lengthy lessons on podcasts. For those who cannot afford a course or those who choose not to pay as they feel they do not need the support, this is a great option. 


References:

Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (5th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson
 
Stanford University. (October 5, 2013). Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved from:     

2 comments:

  1. Interesting, Layla. It seems like there should be more diverse interactivity so that all kinds of learners could benefit. Nevertheless, I bet I would like this because I'm a fan of podcasts. Different strokes for different folks, right? ;-)
    Cheers,
    Lesley

    ReplyDelete
  2. I enjoyed reading through your analysis of the open source course that you reviewed. As I was viewing different options for this week's assignment I noted that the vast majority of the open source courses had very little interactive components. It is nice that the one that you reviewed at least shared information on the course activities, but I definitely agree that if an open source course is going to be used other than just for casual advancement of one's knowledge on a topic then there certainly needs to be more supports in place.

    ReplyDelete